“… there is no reason for us to now NOT go and replace …”

Schumer says…“The very same people who don’t want the Fairness Doctrine want the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] to limit pornography on the air”

We have a constitutional provision that grants a GENERAL condition of freedom of speech.

With pronography, we have a SPECIFIC case where we make an EXCEPTION to the otherwise fondational principle of the GENERAL condition in order to meet reasonable standards of decency (something dems have little concern for, in general).

The mind game that Schumer is playing is to say that because we have made a SPECIFIC EXCEPTION then there is no reason for us to now go and replace the gold standard of the GENERAL condition with the SPECIFIC EXCEPTION.

It won’t be long before no freedom of speech is allowed, but they make an exception for pornography (and any other perversion they or their constituents have the hots for).

It’s sick twisted Leftist “reasoning” and such obvious double speak that if I am the only one who sees the problem (haven’t heard or read anyone else say that) then we are really in deep trouble.