Comments on: Ron Paul Blames America for Benazir Bhutto’s Assassination

By: John

John — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:20:50 +0000

Think for yourself brother. Question authority. I’m a veteran and I’m voting for Ron Paul. Calling him a fruitcake is pretty stupid. How about an intelligent reason why you think I should vote for a different candidate? War is a racket. Major General Smedley Butler thought so, and so do I. I support the troops, but they shouldn’t be there. Have you read the United States Constitution lately? Republicans are crooks and Democrats are crooks. Republicans should be proud of someone like Ron Paul gracing their party with his presidential run!

By: mike

mike — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:31:34 +0000

you guys are morons. bhutto herself said us military intervention was encouraging terrorists.

By: C. Baker

C. Baker — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:34:31 +0000

Much of what Dr. Paul said in that interview was not even heard by the writer of this article. #1 He said the US had “Zero”..responsibility for Bhutto’s death, and he certainly disagreed with the writer’s statement that we should not have worked with Musharraf to get rid of al Qaeda. He also mentioned that if we do not have the money to continue our “war-mongering” (my quotes) we can not do it. Sometimes even a country has to realize their budget. He said it would be bad to print up worthless paper, borrow money from China, or spend Americans money which we paid for things like roads and infostructure. Please understand that Dr. Paul has written books and is a very knowledgeable man, and has strong reasons for his “never-waffling” positions.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:13:42 +0000

So your saying our troops being there now is doing so great? Don’t you people study history? Turn off the TV and read. Google Ron Paul for starters and you’ll see thru the BS they show you on TV.

Fox, MSNBC and CNN DON’T WANT HIM ELECTED, THEY WANT THE STATUS QUO, WAKE UP AMERICA I’M BEGGING YOU. COROPORATIONS ARE RUNNING AMERICA INTO THE GROUND.

By: Alexia for Ron Paul

Alexia for Ron Paul — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:27:48 +0000

Actually, Paul blamed the dead suicide bomber for Benazir Bhutto’s assination.

Beats the hell out of the other politicians who think we need to go get involved in Pakistani civil war.

By: truthseeker

truthseeker — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:59:46 +0000

Dr. Paul’s comments make the most sense of any candidate.

How can anyone in the U.S. support sending our taxdollars (remember we are broke and the biggest debtor nation in the world) to a Pakistani military dictator who is puppet of the U.S.?

And where do we think bin Laden is hiding ? oh yeh Pakistan.

Could we screw this up any worse than we are doing ow?
It is time for a Doctor to come in and clean up the mess the frat boys made.

How many decades will it take for Bush to get bin Laden?

By: sheri cummins

sheri cummins — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:54:45 +0000

Only problem is that Ron is right. US has a disastorous policy that looks at only the next 4 or 8 years. They supported Mujahideen (arabic for people who fight jihad) and islamic military dictator in 80′s because the short term interest was destroying communism. Pakistan became a nuclear power in the 80′s while US was focused on only one thing – communism. There is NO WAY US can destroy al-qaeda and muslims extremists. Only muslims can do that. And for that to happen US needs to stay out because one thing is a fact – both extremists and moderates hate US intervention. I am a democrat but Ron Paul is right on. You don’t see it because you can’t take criticism – typical republican failing