http://blogsofwar.com/2006/12/06/iraq-study-group-gives-report-to-president-bush/ National security, intelligence, global conflict, and crisis monitoring since 2002 Sun, 13 May 2012 17:32:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://blogsofwar.com/2006/12/06/iraq-study-group-gives-report-to-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-27823 warner Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:56:30 +0000 http://www.blogsofwar.com/2006/12/06/iraq-study-group-gives-report-to-president-bush/#comment-27823 <strike>

]]> http://blogsofwar.com/2006/12/06/iraq-study-group-gives-report-to-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23246 warner Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:20:59 +0000 http://www.blogsofwar.com/2006/12/06/iraq-study-group-gives-report-to-president-bush/#comment-23246 Since Bush is going for it and not pulling out , and understanding he does not know what he is doing . i have a few sugestions . one you have have to tackle terror bye puting terror in the face of terror . seconed you have to take charge of the east and stand strong with out seconed guessing your self . i have so many thoughts on how it can be won . and it can be but its a ugly win . Since Bush is going for it and not pulling out , and understanding he does not know what he is doing . i have a few sugestions . one you have have to tackle terror bye puting terror in the face of terror . seconed you have to take charge of the east and stand strong with out seconed guessing your self . i have so many thoughts on how it can be won . and it can be but its a ugly win .

]]> http://blogsofwar.com/2006/12/06/iraq-study-group-gives-report-to-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-9625 warner wunnemann Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:32:46 +0000 http://www.blogsofwar.com/2006/12/06/iraq-study-group-gives-report-to-president-bush/#comment-9625 The exact conduct of war will depend to a great extent upon its objectives, which may include factors such as the seizure of territory, the annihilation of a rival state, the subjugation of another people or recognition of one's own people as a separate state. Typically any military action by one state is opposed, ie is countered by the military forces of one or more states. Therefore, the ultimate objective of each state becomes secondary to the immediate objective of removing or nullification of the resistance offered by the opposing military forces. This may be accomplished variously by out-maneuvering them, by destroying them in open battle, by causing them to desert or surrender, or to be destroyed by indirect action such pestilence and starvation. Now there are to too many rules to war as of now a days . war is not pritty or was it ever ment to be pretty . so it will be the forever war or untill you bankrupt your own contry due to tomany rules and fundamentals and human rights. First off what started this all this war stuff in the east . to force diplomacy . was it to get oil and money from them look back i think it was do to being pisst about the trade center ? then some how it turned in to something about oil then it turned in to deplomacey. next we all know we the west u.s.a. will not win. why you ask ? now the whay the east wins is not bye killing you that is a smoke screen . what they do is keep you tied up in war till your daller bottoms out (you are now poor) look at the daller u.s.a before the war and look at it know. This has been one of the most nicest wars ever . Seconed off the east has all the time in the world they are in no rush . but it seems the west is . time is money to the west . so with time on the easts side i see no good whey this will end . there is no whey to fight time. we all know that ? you can't have pace and war we all know that . ? There is no nice whay to win war . The exact conduct of war will depend to a great extent upon its objectives, which may include factors such as the seizure of territory, the annihilation of a rival state, the subjugation of another people or recognition of one’s own people as a separate state. Typically any military action by one state is opposed, ie is countered by the military forces of one or more states. Therefore, the ultimate objective of each state becomes secondary to the immediate objective of removing or nullification of the resistance offered by the opposing military forces. This may be accomplished variously by out-maneuvering them, by destroying them in open battle, by causing them to desert or surrender, or to be destroyed by indirect action such pestilence and starvation.
Now there are to too many rules to war as of now a days . war is not pritty or was it ever ment to be pretty . so it will be the forever war or untill you bankrupt your own contry due to tomany rules and fundamentals and human rights.
First off what started this all this war stuff in the east . to force diplomacy .
was it to get oil and money from them look back i think it was do to being pisst about the trade center ?
then some how it turned in to something about oil then it turned in to deplomacey.
next we all know we the west u.s.a. will not win.
why you ask ?
now the whay the east wins is not bye killing you that is a smoke screen . what they do is keep you tied up in war till your daller bottoms out (you are now poor)
look at the daller u.s.a before the war and look at it know. This has been one of the most nicest wars ever .
Seconed off the east has all the time in the world they are in no rush . but it seems the west is . time is money to the west .
so with time on the easts side i see no good whey this will end . there is no whey to fight time. we all know that ?
you can’t have pace and war we all know that . ?
There is no nice whay to win war .

]]>