Iraq Study Group Gives Report to President Bush

Iraq Study Group Gives Report to President Bush

by John Little on 6/12/2006

President Bush got a preview Tuesday of the Iraq commission’s ideas for changing war policies, as the White House sought to dampen the report’s impact by emphasizing that Bush will be listening to other voices as well.

Over lunch at the White House, former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, the Iraq Study Group’s Republican co-chairman, gave Bush a private briefing on the general outline of the conclusions, said Dana Perino, a presidential spokeswoman.

The report — which Baker referred to during the lunch, Perino said — will be released Wednesday morning. The full commission, led by Baker and former Democratic Rep. Lee Hamilton of Indiana, will give a copy of the report to Bush at 7 a.m. EST.

Following the presentation to the president, the group is to brief Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and his team via secure videoconference from the White House.

Leaked accounts don’t lead me to believe that there’s anything earth-shattering in the report. That won’t stop the media from selecting relatively minor points and sensationalizing them. One important point, which Democrats will manage to overlook:

“What we recommend demands a tremendous amount of political will and cooperation between executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government,” the report says. “Foreign policy is doomed to failure — as is any action in Iraq — if not supported by broad sustained consensus. The aim of our report is to move our country towards such a consensus.”

That might be the bleakest assessment in the report.

Update:
The report has been released and is available for download in PDF format.

Related posts:
Bloggers React: The Iraq Study Group Report
The report is now available. I’ll be rounding up some reaction from the blogosphere and add my own thoughts after I’ve read thought the report. My initial thoughts are that...

President Bush Speaks – The New Way Forward in Iraq
I’ve already covered the details of the plan in an earlier post. I have my doubts about the plan. So much of it seems to depend on an immediate change...

BBC News: President Bush to Boost Troop Levels in Iraq – Focus on Security
Word on the new plan is, not surprisingly, leaking out: The BBC was told by a senior administration source that the speech setting out changes in Mr Bush’s Iraq policy...

President Bush Lifts Executive Ban on Offshore Drilling
It’s a meaningless act but it may increase pressure on Congress: In another push to deal with soaring gas prices, President Bush on Monday will lift an executive ban on...

President Bush: “We’re not winning, we’re not losing”
I actually find that statement to be pretty accurate. The current situation may seem intolerable to some but we’re nowhere near losing. We also haven’t acted with the military and...

Support

Please show your support for the work done here, and on Twitter, with a PayPal contribution.

There are 3 comments in this article:

7/12/2006warner wunnemann says:

The exact conduct of war will depend to a great extent upon its objectives, which may include factors such as the seizure of territory, the annihilation of a rival state, the subjugation of another people or recognition of one’s own people as a separate state. Typically any military action by one state is opposed, ie is countered by the military forces of one or more states. Therefore, the ultimate objective of each state becomes secondary to the immediate objective of removing or nullification of the resistance offered by the opposing military forces. This may be accomplished variously by out-maneuvering them, by destroying them in open battle, by causing them to desert or surrender, or to be destroyed by indirect action such pestilence and starvation.
Now there are to too many rules to war as of now a days . war is not pritty or was it ever ment to be pretty . so it will be the forever war or untill you bankrupt your own contry due to tomany rules and fundamentals and human rights.
First off what started this all this war stuff in the east . to force diplomacy .
was it to get oil and money from them look back i think it was do to being pisst about the trade center ?
then some how it turned in to something about oil then it turned in to deplomacey.
next we all know we the west u.s.a. will not win.
why you ask ?
now the whay the east wins is not bye killing you that is a smoke screen . what they do is keep you tied up in war till your daller bottoms out (you are now poor)
look at the daller u.s.a before the war and look at it know. This has been one of the most nicest wars ever .
Seconed off the east has all the time in the world they are in no rush . but it seems the west is . time is money to the west .
so with time on the easts side i see no good whey this will end . there is no whey to fight time. we all know that ?
you can’t have pace and war we all know that . ?
There is no nice whay to win war .
11/01/2007warner says:

Since Bush is going for it and not pulling out , and understanding he does not know what he is doing . i have a few sugestions . one you have have to tackle terror bye puting terror in the face of terror . seconed you have to take charge of the east and stand strong with out seconed guessing your self . i have so many thoughts on how it can be won . and it can be but its a ugly win .
3/03/2007warner says:

Blogs of War